H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tatsuma Ito vs Noah Rubin H2H: 1-0
Tatsuma Ito holds a 1–0 lead over Noah Rubin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2015 Newport third round 6-3 6-7(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 6-4 6-4 | Noah Rubin | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2015* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Tatsuma Ito | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-4 | Noah Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noah Rubin | #1,126 | #125 | 456 | 1,692 | 8 | 21 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatsuma Ito | Noah Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #604 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |