H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tatsuma Ito vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 0-1
Somdev Devvarman holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2011 Atlanta fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 7-6(6) 6-0 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2011* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 6-1 6-3 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2009 | Washington | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 6-3 6-3 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatsuma Ito | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |