H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Amer Delic H2H: 1-1
Taylor Dent and Amer Delic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on grass, while Amer Delic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amer Delic won the 2009 Australian Open first round 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BIH
Age 44
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Amer Delic | 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2005* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Taylor Dent | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Amer Delic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Amer Delic | #1,041 | #60 | 728 | 1,718 | 25 | 53 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Amer Delic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #447 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #93 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #219 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |