H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-0
Taylor Dent holds a 2–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2003 Queen's Club third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Taylor Dent | 6-4 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2003* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |