H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 0-1
Christophe Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2006 Rotterdam fourth round 7-6(0) RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 7-6(0) (ret.) | Taylor Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Christophe Rochus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |