H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-1
Taylor Dent and Horacio Zeballos are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on clay, while Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2010 Atlanta fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2010* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2010* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-3 (ret.) | Taylor Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |