H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-2
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 2–1 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2004 Tokyo fourth round 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2003* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-2 7-6(5) | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 6-4 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taylor Dent | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |