H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-1
Taylor Dent and Justin Gimelstob are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2004 Bangkok third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1999* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-2 6-2 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |