H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Peter Luczak H2H: 1-0
Taylor Dent holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Luczak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2004 Beijing third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Taylor Dent | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-3 6-2 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Peter Luczak | #1,007 | #64 | 775 | 1,685 | 37 | 80 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Peter Luczak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #166 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #77 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #137 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |