H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taylor Fritz vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 2-2

Taylor Fritz and Albert Ramos-Vinolas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Taylor Fritz leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2021 Cincinnati Open first round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taylor Fritz
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #49 4-6 6-4 6-4 Taylor Fritz #42 Match data Aug 17, 2021* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #37 7-5 5-7 6-4 Taylor Fritz #30 Match data May 4, 2021* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Taylor Fritz #31 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #46 Match data Feb 10, 2021* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Taylor Fritz #127 7-6(5) 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #23 Match data Aug 3, 2017* R16 Los Cabos Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taylor Fritz #10 #4 5,575 2,107 342 212 61.7% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taylor Fritz Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2015 1–1 50.0% #174 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 15–22 40.5% #76 1,694 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 13–13 50.0% #104 1,770 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 22–18 55.0% #49 1,814 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2019 30–28 51.7% #32 1,834 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2020 12–13 48.0% #29 1,782 0 1 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2021 34–22 60.7% #23 1,937 0 1 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2022 41–18 69.5% #9 1,989 0 4 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2023 49–23 68.1% #10 1,942 0 6 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2024 49–21 70.0% #4 2,097 0 8 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2025 46–21 68.7% #6 2,010 0 10 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2026 30–12 71.4% #10 2,008 0 11 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taylor Fritz Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 16 12 28 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 14 17 31 45.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2021 28 16 44 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 2022 28 12 40 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2023 35 13 48 72.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2024 24 12 36 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 10 2 12 83.3% 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2025 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 19 7 26 73.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 230 141 371 62.0% 55 43 98 56.1% 57 28 85 67.1% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 545/556 of Taylor Fritz's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taylor Fritz Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2015 2/2 8.5 0.5 53.7% 65.9% 52.6% 73.9% 40.0% 60.0% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 37/37 8.5 2.8 56.8% 73.3% 48.4% 61.8% 34.3% 62.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 26/26 8.2 2.6 56.1% 73.9% 54.2% 48.1% 43.9% 65.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 40/40 8.9 2.8 60.1% 73.9% 51.0% 60.7% 38.7% 64.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 57/58 9.2 2.4 57.9% 76.1% 51.6% 55.9% 38.4% 65.7% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 25/25 12.2 2.0 60.7% 78.6% 49.8% 56.0% 28.1% 67.3% 35.9% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2021 56/56 9.5 3.1 59.0% 75.3% 52.3% 58.3% 43.5% 65.6% 36.4% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 2022 58/59 10.4 2.3 62.0% 77.7% 53.3% 65.2% 40.9% 68.4% 38.6% 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2023 71/72 9.4 2.3 59.7% 79.3% 55.2% 61.8% 48.8% 69.6% 39.6% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2024 67/70 10.6 1.8 62.8% 79.3% 57.0% 69.2% 40.3% 71.1% 35.9% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2025 64/67 12.0 2.0 64.0% 80.5% 55.3% 57.4% 42.7% 71.0% 36.3% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2026 42/44 14.9 1.8 67.6% 79.7% 54.5% 63.7% 32.5% 71.7% 33.7% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taylor Fritz Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1482 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1507 113.2 -0.76 -0.24 0.777 48.5% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1695 147.5 -0.84 -1.28 0.922 48.9% +18 -159 -92 42.7% -0.31 7–8 (47%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1770 138.9 +1.00 -0.20 1.035 50.5% +16 — — 49.3% +0.22 5–5 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — +0.90 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1815 139.0 +0.79 -0.49 1.007 50.1% +12 -224 -211 52.4% -0.06 9–8 (53%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.50 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1835 152.6 +1.58 -1.90 0.955 49.6% -45 -59 -88 50.4% -0.07 7–7 (50%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.51 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1782 151.9 +2.09 +0.24 1.100 51.3% +39 -38 — 50.0% +0.18 4–4 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.83 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2021 1938 158.6 +2.49 +0.57 1.059 51.0% +9 -187 -145 56.7% +0.33 12–7 (63%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.41 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2022 1989 163.3 +4.68 +2.81 1.223 53.1% +42 -201 -69 64.6% +0.96 17–12 (59%) 21–16 (57%) — +2.99 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2023 1943 159.6 +5.21 +3.27 1.305 54.3% +79 -72 -109 65.6% +0.98 12–13 (48%) 21–17 (55%) — +3.67 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2024 2098 165.1 +6.97 +0.97 1.243 53.2% -3 -127 -87 65.1% +1.01 10–7 (59%) 21–12 (64%) — -0.06 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2025 2011 160.1 +6.05 +1.34 1.253 53.4% -9 -123 +132 63.2% +0.86 12–6 (67%) 24–22 (52%) — +0.62 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2026 2009 148.0 +5.85 -0.40 1.193 52.4% -13 — +120 63.7% +0.65 11–4 (73%) 18–10 (64%) — +0.11 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 2107 160.9 +3.76 +0.71 1.129 51.9% +15 -121 -19 58.6% +0.54 106–81 (57%) 179–137 (57%) 104.3 +1.35 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.