H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:17 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 1-1
Taylor Fritz and Botic van de Zandschulp are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay, while Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2026 Miami Open Presented by Itau second round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | Miami Open Presented by Itau | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2023* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 7-6(2) | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |