H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Taylor Fritz and Botic van de Zandschulp are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay, while Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2026 Miami Open second round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Mar 20, 2026 | R64 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 7-6(2) | Taylor Fritz | Match data | Apr 22, 2023* | SF | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,107 | 343 | 212 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,937 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,942 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #4 | 2,097 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,010 | 0 | 10 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #10 | 2,011 | 0 | 11 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 45.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 35 | 13 | 48 | 72.9% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 231 | 141 | 372 | 62.1% | 55 | 43 | 98 | 56.1% | 57 | 28 | 85 | 67.1% | — | 77 | 76 | 153 | 50.3% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 546/556 of Taylor Fritz's and 242/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2/2 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 53.7% | 65.9% | 52.6% | 73.9% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 31.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 37/37 | 8.5 | 2.8 | 56.8% | 73.3% | 48.4% | 61.8% | 34.3% | 62.6% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 26/26 | 8.2 | 2.6 | 56.1% | 73.9% | 54.2% | 48.1% | 43.9% | 65.1% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 40/40 | 8.9 | 2.8 | 60.1% | 73.9% | 51.0% | 60.7% | 38.7% | 64.8% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 57/58 | 9.2 | 2.4 | 57.9% | 76.1% | 51.6% | 55.9% | 38.4% | 65.7% | 32.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 25/25 | 12.2 | 2.0 | 60.7% | 78.6% | 49.8% | 56.0% | 28.1% | 67.3% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 56/56 | 9.5 | 3.1 | 59.0% | 75.3% | 52.3% | 58.3% | 43.5% | 65.6% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 58/59 | 10.4 | 2.3 | 62.0% | 77.7% | 53.3% | 65.2% | 40.9% | 68.4% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 71/72 | 9.4 | 2.3 | 59.7% | 79.3% | 55.2% | 61.8% | 48.8% | 69.6% | 39.6% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2024 | 67/70 | 10.6 | 1.8 | 62.8% | 79.3% | 57.0% | 69.2% | 40.3% | 71.1% | 35.9% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | 2025 | 64/67 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 64.0% | 80.5% | 55.3% | 57.4% | 42.7% | 71.0% | 36.3% | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 43/44 | 14.8 | 1.8 | 67.7% | 80.0% | 54.1% | 64.5% | 32.3% | 71.8% | 33.9% | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 40/40 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 62.1% | 73.6% | 45.9% | 65.0% | 46.6% | 63.3% | 38.9% |
| Career | — | 546/556 | 10.3 | 2.3 | 60.9% | 77.4% | 53.4% | 60.8% | 40.3% | 68.0% | 36.2% | — | 242/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.8% | 47.2% | 59.6% | 41.0% | 62.4% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1482 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1507 | 113.2 | -0.76 | -0.24 | 0.777 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1695 | 147.5 | -0.84 | -1.28 | 0.922 | 48.9% | +18 | -159 | -92 | 42.7% | -0.31 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | +0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1770 | 138.9 | +1.00 | -0.20 | 1.035 | 50.5% | +16 | — | — | 49.3% | +0.22 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–10 (33%) | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1815 | 139.0 | +0.79 | -0.49 | 1.007 | 50.1% | +12 | -224 | -211 | 52.4% | -0.06 | 9–8 (53%) | 19–7 (73%) | — | +0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 1835 | 152.6 | +1.58 | -1.90 | 0.955 | 49.6% | -45 | -59 | -88 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 7–7 (50%) | 17–11 (61%) | — | -2.51 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 1782 | 151.9 | +2.09 | +0.24 | 1.100 | 51.3% | +39 | -38 | — | 50.0% | +0.18 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.83 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 1938 | 158.6 | +2.49 | +0.57 | 1.059 | 51.0% | +9 | -187 | -145 | 56.7% | +0.33 | 12–7 (63%) | 20–15 (57%) | — | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 1989 | 163.3 | +4.68 | +2.81 | 1.223 | 53.1% | +42 | -201 | -69 | 64.6% | +0.96 | 17–12 (59%) | 21–16 (57%) | — | +2.99 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 1943 | 159.6 | +5.21 | +3.27 | 1.305 | 54.3% | +79 | -72 | -109 | 65.6% | +0.98 | 12–13 (48%) | 21–17 (55%) | — | +3.67 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2024 | 2098 | 165.1 | +6.97 | +0.97 | 1.243 | 53.2% | -3 | -127 | -87 | 65.1% | +1.01 | 10–7 (59%) | 21–12 (64%) | — | -0.06 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | 2025 | 2011 | 160.1 | +6.05 | +1.34 | 1.253 | 53.4% | -9 | -123 | +132 | 63.2% | +0.86 | 12–6 (67%) | 24–22 (52%) | — | +0.62 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | 2026 | 2011 | 147.7 | +5.90 | -0.21 | 1.204 | 52.5% | -10 | — | +118 | 64.7% | +0.72 | 11–4 (73%) | 18–10 (64%) | — | +0.24 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1779 | 145.0 | -0.88 | +2.63 | 1.057 | 51.2% | +42 | -74 | -137 | 56.3% | +0.39 | 4–8 (33%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 2107 | 160.9 | +3.77 | +0.72 | 1.130 | 52.0% | +15 | -121 | -19 | 58.7% | +0.54 | 106–81 (57%) | 179–137 (57%) | 104.3 | +1.37 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.90 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 50.0% | +8 | -49 | -86 | 48.9% | -0.06 | 38–38 (50%) | 62–53 (54%) | 105.3 | -2.45 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jul 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 11 | 11 | Sep 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Denis Shapovalov | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Lorenzo Sonego | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Frances Tiafoe | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |