H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Daniel Evans H2H: 1-2
Daniel Evans holds a 2–1 lead over Taylor Fritz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2022 Canada Masters fourth round 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2022* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2022* | Washington | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 (ret.) | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
| May 11, 2021* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-2 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |