H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Taylor Fritz holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2017 Chengdu third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 7-5 6-1 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taylor Fritz | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |