H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Grigor Dimitrov H2H: 2-1
Taylor Fritz holds a 2–1 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Fritz leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2024 Rome Masters fourth round 6-2 6-7(11) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Taylor Fritz | 6-2 6-7(11) 6-1 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| May 26, 2023* | Geneva | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 3-6 7-5 7-6(2) | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
| May 7, 2019* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Taylor Fritz | 7-6(8) 7-6(4) | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Grigor Dimitrov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 |