H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taylor Fritz vs Grigor Dimitrov H2H: 2-1

Taylor Fritz holds a 2–1 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Fritz leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2024 Italian Open fourth round 6-2 6-7(11) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taylor Fritz
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taylor Fritz #13 6-2 6-7(11) 6-1 Grigor Dimitrov #10 Match data May 15, 2024* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Grigor Dimitrov #33 3-6 7-5 7-6(2) Taylor Fritz #9 Match data May 26, 2023* SF Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Taylor Fritz #57 7-6(8) 7-6(4) Grigor Dimitrov #46 Match data May 7, 2019* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taylor Fritz #10 #4 5,575 2,107 342 212 61.7% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Grigor Dimitrov #137 #3 5,150 2,170 477 314 60.3% 0 1 1 1 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taylor Fritz Grigor Dimitrov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2015 1–1 50.0% #174 1,506 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,478 0 0
18 2016 15–22 40.5% #76 1,694 0 0 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,489 0 0
19 2017 13–13 50.0% #104 1,770 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,493 0 0
20 2018 22–18 55.0% #49 1,814 0 0 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,740 0 0
21 2019 30–28 51.7% #32 1,834 0 1 2012 24–19 55.8% #48 1,845 0 0
22 2020 12–13 48.0% #29 1,782 0 1 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,955 0 1
23 2021 34–22 60.7% #23 1,937 0 1 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,092 0 4
24 2022 41–18 69.5% #9 1,989 0 4 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,951 0 4
25 2023 49–23 68.1% #10 1,942 0 6 2016 40–26 60.6% #17 2,002 0 4
26 2024 49–21 70.0% #4 2,097 0 8 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8
27 2025 46–21 68.7% #6 2,010 0 10 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,934 0 8
28 2026 30–12 71.4% #10 2,008 0 11 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,928 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,936 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,932 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,863 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,094 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,011 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,958 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2026 8–13 38.1% #137 1,770 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taylor Fritz Grigor Dimitrov
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2017 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2018 16 12 28 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 11 16 27 40.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 2019 14 17 31 45.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2021 28 16 44 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 28 13 41 68.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9%
24 2022 28 12 40 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2015 20 15 35 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2023 35 13 48 72.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2016 34 18 52 65.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2024 24 12 36 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 10 2 12 83.3% 2017 39 11 50 78.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
27 2025 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 2018 16 12 28 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 19 7 26 73.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 2019 18 13 31 58.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 11 8 19 57.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 15 15 30 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 26 13 39 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 33 12 45 73.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 10 7 17 58.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
Career — 230 141 371 62.0% 55 43 98 56.1% 57 28 85 67.1% — 316 202 518 61.0% 106 76 182 58.2% 55 36 91 60.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 545/556 of Taylor Fritz's and 781/791 of Grigor Dimitrov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taylor Fritz Grigor Dimitrov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2015 2/2 8.5 0.5 53.7% 65.9% 52.6% 73.9% 40.0% 60.0% 31.1% 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 70.8% 58.8% 35.7% 33.3% 0.0% 52.1% 20.9%
18 2016 37/37 8.5 2.8 56.8% 73.3% 48.4% 61.8% 34.3% 62.6% 34.5% 2009 8/8 4.8 3.1 58.8% 69.4% 43.1% 46.4% 36.1% 58.5% 30.4%
19 2017 26/26 8.2 2.6 56.1% 73.9% 54.2% 48.1% 43.9% 65.1% 36.1% 2010 2/2 8.5 3.0 55.4% 75.2% 40.1% 53.6% 28.6% 59.3% 27.1%
20 2018 40/40 8.9 2.8 60.1% 73.9% 51.0% 60.7% 38.7% 64.8% 35.5% 2011 43/43 5.4 3.7 59.6% 70.9% 50.5% 55.6% 36.8% 62.6% 35.9%
21 2019 57/58 9.2 2.4 57.9% 76.1% 51.6% 55.9% 38.4% 65.7% 32.8% 2012 41/43 7.3 2.8 62.6% 72.6% 53.3% 65.4% 38.7% 65.5% 35.9%
22 2020 25/25 12.2 2.0 60.7% 78.6% 49.8% 56.0% 28.1% 67.3% 35.9% 2013 58/58 8.1 2.8 61.7% 77.0% 51.5% 58.3% 43.5% 67.2% 36.8%
23 2021 56/56 9.5 3.1 59.0% 75.3% 52.3% 58.3% 43.5% 65.6% 36.4% 2014 67/68 7.8 3.2 60.7% 77.6% 54.1% 59.6% 45.6% 68.4% 37.7%
24 2022 58/59 10.4 2.3 62.0% 77.7% 53.3% 65.2% 40.9% 68.4% 38.6% 2015 54/54 7.3 2.8 62.3% 75.8% 53.0% 63.2% 39.4% 67.3% 37.4%
25 2023 71/72 9.4 2.3 59.7% 79.3% 55.2% 61.8% 48.8% 69.6% 39.6% 2016 64/66 5.8 3.4 64.3% 73.3% 52.7% 59.2% 43.2% 65.9% 37.6%
26 2024 67/70 10.6 1.8 62.8% 79.3% 57.0% 69.2% 40.3% 71.1% 35.9% 2017 68/68 8.2 3.7 62.6% 79.1% 53.6% 66.2% 40.1% 69.3% 39.0%
27 2025 64/67 12.0 2.0 64.0% 80.5% 55.3% 57.4% 42.7% 71.0% 36.3% 2018 43/43 7.7 5.2 61.4% 73.6% 48.8% 59.5% 37.5% 64.2% 35.0%
28 2026 42/44 14.9 1.8 67.6% 79.7% 54.5% 63.7% 32.5% 71.7% 33.7% 2019 43/44 7.3 4.2 62.3% 74.9% 50.0% 59.9% 46.6% 65.5% 37.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 26/27 4.7 4.3 61.7% 72.4% 51.6% 66.4% 46.4% 64.0% 41.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/42 5.0 3.5 63.6% 74.4% 51.3% 61.6% 43.2% 65.9% 39.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 48/48 5.6 2.9 63.1% 76.0% 51.7% 55.2% 41.7% 67.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 60/62 7.3 3.4 61.1% 77.0% 50.7% 62.2% 43.9% 66.9% 38.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 63/63 8.4 3.7 61.3% 80.7% 53.7% 61.1% 40.2% 70.2% 37.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 29/30 7.5 3.4 59.4% 74.4% 50.7% 55.8% 36.9% 64.9% 36.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 21/21 8.7 4.6 61.3% 74.5% 47.9% 45.2% 36.7% 64.1% 33.8%
Career — 545/556 10.3 2.3 60.9% 77.4% 53.4% 60.8% 40.4% 68.0% 36.1% — 781/791 7.1 3.5 61.9% 75.7% 51.8% 60.1% 41.4% 66.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taylor Fritz Grigor Dimitrov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1482 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1507 113.2 -0.76 -0.24 0.777 48.5% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — 0.00 2008 1479 90.8 -1.82 +0.78 0.437 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09
18 2016 1695 147.5 -0.84 -1.28 0.922 48.9% +18 -159 -92 42.7% -0.31 7–8 (47%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.79 2009 1490 121.9 -1.06 -2.37 0.732 45.0% +40 — +34 33.3% -0.89 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
19 2017 1770 138.9 +1.00 -0.20 1.035 50.5% +16 — — 49.3% +0.22 5–5 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — +0.90 2010 1493 103.4 -2.32 -0.55 0.667 44.5% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02
20 2018 1815 139.0 +0.79 -0.49 1.007 50.1% +12 -224 -211 52.4% -0.06 9–8 (53%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.50 2011 1740 144.9 -0.28 -0.43 0.959 49.3% +7 -209 -140 42.0% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.35
21 2019 1835 152.6 +1.58 -1.90 0.955 49.6% -45 -59 -88 50.4% -0.07 7–7 (50%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.51 2012 1845 146.9 +2.63 -0.68 1.039 50.7% -52 -102 -118 54.2% +0.23 8–4 (67%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.45
22 2020 1782 151.9 +2.09 +0.24 1.100 51.3% +39 -38 — 50.0% +0.18 4–4 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.83 2013 1955 168.1 +4.20 +0.76 1.120 51.9% -13 -58 -221 55.8% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.02
23 2021 1938 158.6 +2.49 +0.57 1.059 51.0% +9 -187 -145 56.7% +0.33 12–7 (63%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.41 2014 2093 169.3 +4.59 +2.51 1.192 52.9% -39 -97 -71 64.0% +0.90 18–4 (82%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.89
24 2022 1989 163.3 +4.68 +2.81 1.223 53.1% +42 -201 -69 64.6% +0.96 17–12 (59%) 21–16 (57%) — +2.99 2015 1951 164.5 +2.92 +1.96 1.144 52.0% +20 +74 +48 56.7% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 15–10 (60%) — +0.70
25 2023 1943 159.6 +5.21 +3.27 1.305 54.3% +79 -72 -109 65.6% +0.98 12–13 (48%) 21–17 (55%) — +3.67 2016 2002 165.1 +2.53 +2.13 1.103 51.5% +34 -107 -45 57.3% +0.34 13–12 (52%) 22–12 (65%) — +0.60
26 2024 2098 165.1 +6.97 +0.97 1.243 53.2% -3 -127 -87 65.1% +1.01 10–7 (59%) 21–12 (64%) — -0.06 2017 2135 173.4 +5.21 +3.48 1.271 53.8% +37 -256 -168 67.2% +1.06 14–12 (54%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.86
27 2025 2011 160.1 +6.05 +1.34 1.253 53.4% -9 -123 +132 63.2% +0.86 12–6 (67%) 24–22 (52%) — +0.62 2018 1935 162.0 +0.98 +0.10 0.977 49.9% +68 -30 +8 52.1% +0.11 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.60
28 2026 2009 148.0 +5.85 -0.40 1.193 52.4% -13 — +120 63.7% +0.65 11–4 (73%) 18–10 (64%) — +0.11 2019 1929 159.5 +1.70 +2.11 1.083 51.2% +44 -27 — 51.7% +0.43 6–7 (46%) 9–21 (30%) — -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1937 153.3 +1.01 +3.79 1.145 52.8% -6 -28 — 60.6% +0.73 4–7 (36%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1933 159.4 +2.32 +3.30 1.156 52.4% +43 -91 — 55.8% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.28
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1864 154.9 +2.60 +1.06 1.118 51.5% +7 +84 -57 53.6% +0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.43
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2095 166.4 +3.66 +3.67 1.165 52.5% -15 -108 -209 63.6% +0.87 12–4 (75%) 18–16 (53%) — -3.30
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2011 162.4 +5.31 +2.38 1.263 53.3% +29 -22 -64 68.7% +1.06 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — +1.17
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1959 144.8 +0.59 +1.48 1.035 50.6% +68 -56 0 65.6% +0.61 5–1 (83%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.39
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1771 127.1 -0.23 -0.93 0.942 49.0% +61 +41 +178 43.3% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.37
Career — 2107 160.9 +3.76 +0.71 1.129 51.9% +15 -121 -19 58.6% +0.54 106–81 (57%) 179–137 (57%) 104.3 +1.35 — 2171 167.1 +2.86 +1.80 1.114 51.7% +17 -58 -71 57.8% +0.52 152–104 (59%) 204–178 (53%) 104.1 -0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.