H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Juan Monaco H2H: 0-1
Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Fritz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2016 Tokyo third round 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2016* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 |