H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-0
Taylor Fritz holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2017 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |