H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Terry Moor vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-2
Roscoe Tanner holds a 2–1 lead over Terry Moor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1978 Maui third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1978* | Maui | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-1 6-4 | Terry Moor | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 6-1 | Terry Moor | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1977* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Terry Moor | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Moor | #554 | #32 | 0 | 1,922 | 237 | 228 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terry Moor | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1977 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #53 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1978 | 35–32 | 52.2% | #73 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1979 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1980 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #53 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1981 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #95 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1983 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #100 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1984 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1985 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #104 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |
| 34 | 1986 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #552 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |