H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Flavio Cipolla H2H: 0-2

Flavio Cipolla holds a 2–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Flavio Cipolla leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavio Cipolla won the 2012 Moscow round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Flavio Cipolla
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Flavio Cipolla #85 6-4 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #168 Match data Oct 18, 2012* R32 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Flavio Cipolla #159 6-2 7-5 Teymuraz Gabashvili #79 Match data May 1, 2011 Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Flavio Cipolla #227 7-6(6) 6-3 5-2 (ret.) Teymuraz Gabashvili #76 Match data May 30, 2007* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Flavio Cipolla #543 #70 736 1,785 35 66 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Flavio Cipolla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #206 1,484 0 0
23 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #142 1,542 0 0
24 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #127 1,601 0 0
25 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0 2009 4–12 25.0% #159 1,615 0 0
26 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,566 0 0
27 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0 2011 5–12 29.4% #75 1,759 0 0
28 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0 2012 17–23 42.5% #95 1,650 0 0
29 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0 2013 2–9 18.2% #188 1,582 0 0
30 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Flavio Cipolla
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — 21 34 55 38.2% 13 25 38 34.2% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's and 101/101 of Flavio Cipolla's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Flavio Cipolla
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5% 2006 1/1 1.0 2.0 66.0% 45.2% 43.8% 44.4% 33.3% 44.7% 34.6%
23 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9% 2007 2/2 1.0 4.5 72.0% 56.1% 47.0% 45.0% 48.3% 53.8% 40.3%
24 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6% 2008 13/13 0.6 4.5 69.3% 58.4% 43.0% 57.4% 39.6% 54.0% 40.4%
25 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9% 2009 16/16 0.9 4.4 68.5% 55.9% 42.3% 54.4% 28.8% 51.8% 35.7%
26 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4% 2010 1/1 2.0 3.0 71.0% 52.3% 44.4% 42.9% — 50.0% 26.7%
27 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8% 2011 17/17 0.7 3.2 64.4% 59.5% 47.3% 49.0% 46.5% 55.4% 36.7%
28 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8% 2012 40/40 0.8 3.2 70.1% 61.9% 46.7% 53.5% 45.2% 57.3% 40.6%
29 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9% 2013 11/11 1.0 3.7 68.1% 55.7% 41.9% 48.7% 50.9% 51.0% 36.2%
30 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9% — 101/101 0.8 3.6 68.6% 59.0% 45.0% 52.5% 42.2% 54.7% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Flavio Cipolla
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15 2006 1485 101.0 +0.37 -2.20 0.626 39.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09
23 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30 2007 1542 110.1 -1.05 +1.76 0.872 47.0% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.21
24 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33 2008 1601 114.0 -4.84 +1.20 0.878 47.1% -13 -22 — 41.2% -1.21 3–1 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 107.8 +0.11
25 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07 2009 1616 121.5 -6.93 +0.11 0.740 43.8% +33 +37 — 29.3% -1.71 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.94
26 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17 2010 1567 107.8 -4.88 +0.44 0.533 40.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
27 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59 2011 1759 130.1 -4.66 +0.49 0.823 46.3% -30 -75 — 27.5% -1.40 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.93
28 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01 2012 1650 133.5 -4.62 +2.25 0.950 49.1% +42 -35 -80 43.2% -0.52 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 102.9 +1.92
29 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72 2013 1583 114.5 -6.05 -1.74 0.740 44.2% +22 +36 — 13.0% -2.43 1–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.53
30 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36 2014 1509 103.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50 2015 1478 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47 2016 1465 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06 — 1786 123.6 -5.06 +0.97 0.849 46.8% +19 -15 -80 33.8% -1.25 12–11 (52%) 13–9 (59%) 106.2 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.