H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Jan Hajek H2H: 1-0
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Hajek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2007 Miami Masters first round 7-5 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Jan Hajek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |