H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1

Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2014 Estoril Open round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #52 6-3 6-3 Lukasz Kubot #76 Match data May 4, 2014 Q2 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #76 6-3 7-5 Teymuraz Gabashvili #52 Match data May 1, 2014* R32 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #137 6-1 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #77 Match data Aug 16, 2009 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6% 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
Career — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34
28 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09
29 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47
30 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63
31 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16
32 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27
33 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.