H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Thanasi Kokkinakis vs Marcos Baghdatis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Thanasi Kokkinakis vs Marcos Baghdatis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thanasi Kokkinakis | #460 | #65 | 802 | 1,864 | 73 | 91 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thanasi Kokkinakis | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #209 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #93 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #454 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #460 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |