H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Federico Coria H2H: 1-1
Thiago Monteiro and Federico Coria are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2024 Bastad third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 34
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2024* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-1 6-3 | Federico Coria | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2023* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Federico Coria | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2020* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Thiago Monteiro | 6-3 6-4 | Federico Coria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Coria | #378 | #49 | 1,063 | 1,716 | 54 | 76 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Federico Coria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #100 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |