H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Giovanni Lapentti H2H: 0-1
Giovanni Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Giovanni Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Giovanni Lapentti won the 2017 Quito third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 43
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2017* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Giovanni Lapentti | 6-3 6-2 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Giovanni Lapentti | #806 | #110 | 444 | 1,617 | 8 | 20 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Giovanni Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #187 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #427 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #645 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #808 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |