H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 0-1
Jiri Vesely holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2018 Istanbul fourth round 6-2 2-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-2 2-6 7-6(3) | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |