H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 1-0
Thiago Monteiro holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2023 Santiago fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |