H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-0
Thiago Monteiro holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2016 Sao Paulo third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |