H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-1
Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2021 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2022 | Adelaide 2 | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Steve Johnson | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |