H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 1-0
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2020 Santiago third round 6-1 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2020* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Seyboth Wild | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |