H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2020 Chile Open first round 6-1 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data | Feb 27, 2020* | R32 | Chile Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #198 | #58 | 855 | 1,767 | 38 | 51 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #500 | #55 | 985 | 1,759 | 45 | 88 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #74 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 37 | 61 | 98 | 37.8% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/89 of Thiago Seyboth Wild's and 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2018 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 58.8% | 72.5% | 60.7% | 25.0% | 20.0% | 67.6% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 56.6% | 69.0% | 55.1% | 53.2% | 27.7% | 63.1% | 34.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 8/8 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 61.0% | 72.5% | 52.4% | 72.7% | 36.2% | 64.8% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 7/7 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 57.6% | 65.3% | 48.3% | 47.4% | 46.0% | 58.2% | 34.4% | 2011 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 48.1% | 68.3% | 47.2% | 47.9% | 30.0% | 57.2% | 34.7% |
| 22 | 2022 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 59.3% | 61.8% | 46.6% | 45.2% | 20.0% | 55.6% | 32.6% | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 64.7% | 69.3% | 51.5% | 54.5% | 22.9% | 63.0% | 33.4% |
| 23 | 2023 | 9/9 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 61.4% | 69.4% | 55.6% | 52.6% | 35.7% | 64.2% | 35.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 42/43 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 62.0% | 69.7% | 50.0% | 59.9% | 46.2% | 62.3% | 34.2% | 2014 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 61.3% | 68.0% | 46.6% | 55.7% | 37.6% | 59.5% | 30.9% |
| 25 | 2025 | 14/14 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 64.1% | 71.1% | 47.4% | 54.6% | 30.6% | 62.9% | 34.3% | 2015 | 6/6 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 59.7% | 60.4% | 49.9% | 54.0% | 38.5% | 55.8% | 33.6% |
| 26 | 2026 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 65.0% | 59.0% | 54.0% | 70.0% | 57.0% | 57.0% | 40.0% | 2016 | 17/17 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 59.5% | 66.0% | 48.1% | 51.3% | 39.0% | 58.1% | 36.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15/15 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 61.7% | 68.1% | 45.2% | 54.6% | 34.5% | 59.3% | 32.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6/6 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 63.8% | 70.7% | 55.0% | 56.1% | 27.1% | 64.8% | 34.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7/7 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 59.1% | 62.4% | 51.3% | 54.4% | 37.8% | 58.0% | 32.1% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5/5 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 60.4% | 64.5% | 55.4% | 39.8% | 26.2% | 60.7% | 37.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22/23 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 60.5% | 69.6% | 49.5% | 63.3% | 43.3% | 61.8% | 38.4% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22/22 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 62.4% | 66.9% | 50.7% | 57.5% | 41.8% | 60.8% | 38.2% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11/11 | 6.1 | 2.7 | 66.3% | 61.8% | 47.4% | 54.7% | 35.9% | 57.1% | 30.8% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8/8 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 64.3% | 67.7% | 51.7% | 70.7% | 45.4% | 62.0% | 39.2% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3/3 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 63.7% | 68.7% | 54.3% | 62.7% | 43.7% | 63.7% | 37.3% |
| Career | — | 88/89 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 61.5% | 69.5% | 50.6% | 57.6% | 40.1% | 62.4% | 34.9% | — | 132/133 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 61.6% | 66.7% | 49.6% | 56.7% | 38.2% | 60.0% | 35.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2018 | 1465 | 96.8 | -2.47 | -1.99 | 1.127 | 49.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1461 | 108.8 | -0.23 | -3.01 | 0.927 | 48.3% | — | +50 | — | 36.4% | -0.45 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 1538 | 120.2 | +1.67 | +0.86 | 1.124 | 52.3% | — | +70 | — | 57.9% | +0.68 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.02 | 2010 | 1501 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1546 | 114.8 | -1.20 | -1.98 | 0.825 | 46.7% | — | +39 | — | 18.8% | -1.44 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.36 | 2011 | 1500 | 108.9 | -0.66 | -2.78 | 0.812 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1495 | 101.6 | -1.01 | -1.23 | 0.734 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.18 | 2012 | 1517 | 112.0 | -0.08 | +1.00 | 0.903 | 47.6% | — | +102 | — | 28.6% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.29 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1585 | 121.5 | +0.46 | -0.41 | 0.981 | 49.1% | -105 | +86 | — | 40.7% | -0.26 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–7 (13%) | — | -0.04 | 2013 | 1488 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 1755 | 142.0 | -1.25 | -1.15 | 0.908 | 49.0% | -28 | -62 | -124 | 47.2% | -0.23 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -0.48 | 2014 | 1607 | 119.1 | -0.79 | -0.08 | 0.764 | 46.3% | — | +17 | — | 35.3% | -1.12 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.10 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1639 | 121.3 | -0.98 | -1.58 | 0.923 | 49.1% | +32 | +40 | — | 44.4% | -0.39 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.10 | 2015 | 1562 | 109.1 | -3.38 | -3.19 | 0.760 | 44.7% | — | +64 | — | 30.8% | -1.38 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.67 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1583 | 101.3 | -2.84 | -1.56 | 0.930 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.12 | 2016 | 1641 | 128.1 | -3.12 | -0.39 | 0.865 | 47.4% | — | +74 | — | 36.1% | -0.72 | 1–0 | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1594 | 127.3 | -2.62 | -2.67 | 0.788 | 46.0% | -62 | +97 | — | 28.2% | -1.28 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1633 | 121.6 | -0.02 | -0.66 | 0.976 | 48.8% | — | +66 | — | 41.2% | -0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.46 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1630 | 113.6 | -2.00 | -2.78 | 0.765 | 45.8% | — | +102 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1673 | 120.0 | +0.34 | +0.61 | 0.957 | 48.7% | — | +68 | — | 33.3% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.21 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1669 | 126.0 | -0.76 | -0.06 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -130 | +123 | — | 50.0% | -0.02 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +1.28 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1644 | 132.9 | -1.83 | -0.30 | 0.974 | 49.6% | -47 | +59 | — | 38.9% | -0.48 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1637 | 121.0 | -3.92 | -3.01 | 0.719 | 44.9% | -49 | +88 | — | 26.9% | -1.31 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.05 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1649 | 125.9 | +0.16 | +0.66 | 1.030 | 50.7% | — | +120 | — | 64.7% | +0.41 | 0–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1602 | 108.5 | -1.57 | +0.51 | 1.028 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.11 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.03 |
| Career | — | 1768 | 129.4 | -0.74 | -1.13 | 0.927 | 49.0% | -28 | +9 | -124 | 43.9% | -0.32 | 17–16 (52%) | 13–22 (37%) | 100.8 | +0.51 | — | 1760 | 127.1 | -1.77 | -0.93 | 0.889 | 48.0% | -71 | +87 | — | 38.2% | -0.70 | 16–22 (42%) | 19–39 (33%) | 92.6 | +1.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 15, 2025 | H2H |
| Nuno Borges | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Hugo Dellien | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 8, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 7, 2019 | H2H |
| Marco Cecchinato | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 13, 2021 | H2H |
| Dusan Lajovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 15, 2018 | H2H |