H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 1-0
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Londero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2020 Santiago fourth round 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2020* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thiago Seyboth Wild | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |