H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Taro Daniel H2H: 0-1
Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Seyboth Wild in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2019 Rio de Janeiro third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |