H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
T. Champion vs D. Rostagno H2H: 1-0
T. Champion holds a 1–0 lead over D. Rostagno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Champion leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, T. Champion won the 1991 Wimbledon fourth round 6-7(12) 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | T. Champion | 6-7(12) 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-3 | D. Rostagno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Rostagno | #1,316 | #13 | 1,392 | 1,920 | 192 | 180 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | T. Champion | D. Rostagno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #428 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #89 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #111 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #486 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |