H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thierry Champion vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-1
Thierry Champion and Libor Pimek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thierry Champion leads 1–0 on clay, while Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thierry Champion won the 1988 Bari third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1988* | Bari | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thierry Champion | 6-2 7-5 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1986* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Libor Pimek | 6-3 6-4 | Thierry Champion | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thierry Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thierry Champion | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |