H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Thierry Champion vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 0-1
Martin Wostenholme holds a 1–0 lead over Thierry Champion in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Wostenholme leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Wostenholme won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 6-3 1-6 6-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Martin Wostenholme | 6-3 1-6 6-7 7-5 6-3 | Thierry Champion | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thierry Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thierry Champion | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |