H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thierry Tulasne vs Damir Keretic H2H: 3-1
Thierry Tulasne holds a 3–1 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thierry Tulasne leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Thierry Tulasne won the 1988 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Thierry Tulasne | 6-1 6-4 6-3 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1986* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thierry Tulasne | 6-2 6-1 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1985* | Bologna | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Thierry Tulasne | 6-0 6-4 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thierry Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thierry Tulasne | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |