H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
T. Tulasne vs E. Iskersky H2H: 1-0
T. Tulasne holds a 1–0 lead over E. Iskersky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Tulasne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, T. Tulasne won the 1982 La Quinta second round 5-7 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1982* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | T. Tulasne | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | E. Iskersky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| E. Iskersky | #750 | #64 | 0 | 1,658 | 33 | 61 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | T. Tulasne | E. Iskersky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #92 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #302 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #724 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |