H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Thomas Blake vs Alex Kim H2H: 1-0

Thomas Blake holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Blake leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Blake won the 2002 Newport round of 32 5-7 6-4 7-5.

USA Age 49 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Blake #381 5-7 6-4 7-5 Alex Kim Match data Jul 11, 2002* R32 Newport ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Blake #1,532 #264 109 1,512 2 5 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alex Kim — — — 1,612 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Blake Alex Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1999 0–1 0.0% #486 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2002 2–2 50.0% #295 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2003 0–2 0.0% #435 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Blake Alex Kim
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 7 19 26 26.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 4/7 of Thomas Blake's and 13/14 of Alex Kim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Blake Alex Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1999 1/1 3.0 1.0 70.6% 44.4% 40.0% 58.3% 50.0% 43.1% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 12/13 2.8 3.6 63.3% 63.5% 52.7% 58.3% 39.6% 59.2% 33.4%
25 2002 1/4 5.0 6.0 72.6% 76.8% 53.8% 71.4% 75.0% 70.5% 35.3% 2004 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.5% 58.3% 47.4% 62.5% 35.7% 54.5% 44.6%
26 2003 2/2 6.0 2.5 67.6% 65.3% 39.3% 38.6% 60.0% 56.9% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Blake Alex Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1497 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.21
22 1999 1481 94.8 -1.89 -0.49 0.630 39.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 2001 1496 95.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — +0.10
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1535 120.1 — — — — +30 — — 39.5% -0.74 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 -0.18
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 109.7 -3.08 -2.02 0.820 46.7% +5 — — 32.4% -1.03 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 +0.38
25 2002 1496 99.3 +2.13 -1.06 1.197 52.3% — — — 45.5% -0.36 2–1 (67%) — — +0.40 2004 1471 98.5 -3.22 -3.51 0.982 49.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.15
26 2003 1450 94.8 -2.99 -0.79 0.698 43.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1513 95.2 -1.44 -0.78 0.761 44.8% — — — 29.4% -1.41 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +9.29 — 1613 112.8 -3.09 -2.13 0.834 46.9% +20 — — 34.1% -1.05 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 93.5 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.