H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Fabbiano vs Jimmy Wang

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Thomas Fabbiano vs Jimmy Wang.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Jimmy Wang
TPE Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Wang #147 2-6 6-3 6-1 Thomas Fabbiano #170 Match data Jun 23, 2014 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Wang #1,017 #85 487 1,733 22 41 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Fabbiano Jimmy Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #184 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 3–8 27.3% #100 1,514 0 0
21 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0 2006 7–15 31.8% #148 1,554 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 3–2 60.0% #148 1,571 0 0
24 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #274 1,545 0 0
27 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0 2012 2–3 40.0% #156 1,634 0 0
28 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #174 1,587 0 0
29 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0 2014 4–5 44.4% #124 1,698 0 0
30 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #310 1,676 0 0
31 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Fabbiano Jimmy Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1% — 13 25 38 34.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's and 63/63 of Jimmy Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Fabbiano Jimmy Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9% 2004 4/4 4.3 2.5 69.0% 67.1% 56.8% 66.1% 41.0% 63.5% 36.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/11 3.1 2.0 62.1% 66.7% 52.1% 51.8% 49.6% 61.1% 34.3%
21 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7% 2006 22/22 3.5 2.2 57.7% 62.4% 48.8% 60.9% 38.9% 56.4% 38.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 3.6 1.8 66.4% 70.2% 45.4% 63.6% 49.5% 61.8% 42.4%
24 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2% 2011 2/2 2.0 2.0 57.2% 64.5% 43.7% 54.4% 59.2% 55.7% 44.2%
27 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3% 2012 5/5 4.0 2.6 64.2% 64.3% 57.5% 65.2% 48.7% 62.1% 37.2%
28 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2% 2013 4/4 5.0 3.0 65.0% 62.3% 46.2% 46.9% 30.5% 56.9% 31.7%
29 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8% 2014 9/9 4.2 2.9 61.8% 66.1% 54.6% 53.7% 42.6% 61.4% 35.2%
30 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6% 2015 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.9% 68.7% 65.1% 71.4% 0.0% 67.3% 18.4%
31 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2% — 63/63 3.7 2.3 61.5% 64.9% 51.1% 58.2% 42.5% 59.5% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Fabbiano Jimmy Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1504 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1488 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04 2004 1510 110.4 +0.26 +2.41 0.988 49.7% -9 — — 36.4% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
20 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1514 117.7 -2.25 +0.22 0.882 48.1% -13 — +76 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.04
21 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19 2006 1555 121.8 -2.71 +1.39 0.893 47.9% -39 -86 +41 35.2% -1.06 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.81
22 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1571 112.6 -0.82 +0.23 1.110 52.1% -71 — — 56.3% +0.31 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.95
23 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1484 94.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11 2011 1545 113.4 -1.19 -0.36 0.998 50.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.06
27 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75 2012 1634 117.0 +0.58 +0.84 0.981 49.4% -61 — — 40.0% 0.00 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
28 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33 2013 1587 108.1 -2.19 -1.68 0.735 44.5% — — +213 30.8% -1.46 1–1 1–0 — +0.11
29 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17 2014 1698 129.1 -2.74 -0.55 0.912 49.0% -83 — +191 44.0% -0.24 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.73
30 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38 2015 1677 113.7 -5.13 +6.83 0.562 45.7% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — -0.18
31 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98 — 1734 122.3 -1.99 +0.67 0.911 48.5% -42 -86 +117 37.9% -0.66 6–13 (32%) 12–16 (43%) 95.9 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.