H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Thomas Fabbiano vs John-Patrick Smith H2H: 1-0
Thomas Fabbiano holds a 1–0 lead over John-Patrick Smith in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Fabbiano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Fabbiano won the 2017 US Open first round 7-6(5) 6-4 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thomas Fabbiano | 7-6(5) 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | John-Patrick Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John-Patrick Smith | #1,551 | #108 | 490 | 1,687 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Fabbiano | John-Patrick Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |