H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Hogstedt vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-0

Thomas Hogstedt holds a 1–0 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1983 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Hogstedt #50 6-3 6-2 Bill Scanlon #17 Match data Aug 18, 1983* R32 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0
20 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0
21 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1
22 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2
23 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2
24 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5
25 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6
26 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6
27 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6
28 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Bill Scanlon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
21 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9%
24 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0%
25 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
26 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2%
27 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4% — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Bill Scanlon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.67 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.46
20 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.47 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) — +2.62
21 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.64 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.30
22 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.44
23 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) — -5.33
24 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.11
25 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.52 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.56
26 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.36 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) — -3.38
27 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.20
28 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.16 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.21
29 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.27
30 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) — +2.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52
Career — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17 — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.