H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Thomas Hogstedt vs Broderick Dyke H2H: 0-1
Broderick Dyke holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Broderick Dyke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Broderick Dyke won the 1985 Melbourne Indoor third round 0-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1985* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Broderick Dyke | 0-6 6-2 6-3 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Broderick Dyke | #819 | #35 | 221 | 1,715 | 78 | 121 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Broderick Dyke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #179 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #113 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #752 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #696 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |