H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Hogstedt vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1
Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1984 Cologne third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1984* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danie Visser | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |