Thomas Hogstedt
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jul 9, 1987 | H2H |
| Jonas Svensson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 26, 1990 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 28, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Thomas Hogstedt vs Daniel Montes De Oca H2H: 1-0
Thomas Hogstedt holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Montes De Oca in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1988 Schenectady round of 32 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | 6-2 6-2 | Daniel Montes De Oca | Match data | Jul 21, 1988* | R32 | Schenectady | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Montes De Oca | — | — | — | 1,500 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Daniel Montes De Oca | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,507 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Daniel Montes De Oca | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1983 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 47 | 83 | 130 | 36.2% | 9 | 24 | 33 | 27.3% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 32 | 37 | 69 | 46.4% | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Daniel Montes De Oca | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1521 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.50 | — | 2–0 | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1539 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 1590 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -47 | — | 48.9% | -0.06 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.8 | +1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1691 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -141 | — | 51.2% | -0.11 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.0 | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 1639 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -131 | — | 42.2% | -0.53 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–5 (58%) | 98.1 | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 1521 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 28.1% | -0.88 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–6 (0%) | 92.6 | +1.64 | 1983 | 1484 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.22 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1504 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -6 | — | 21.7% | -1.87 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.0 | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 1495 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -27 | — | 35.7% | -1.22 | 4–3 (57%) | 6–7 (46%) | 104.5 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 1512 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.61 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1608 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | — | — | 43.2% | -0.91 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.9 | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 1508 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | +6 | 37.2% | -0.67 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–13 (35%) | 94.6 | +1.36 | 1988 | 1453 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.39 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1538 | 127.2 | -2.85 | -2.49 | 0.820 | 46.5% | +39 | — | — | 38.4% | -0.93 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–7 (36%) | 100.3 | -0.11 | 1989 | 1441 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1559 | 120.6 | -2.70 | -1.47 | 0.819 | 46.4% | +35 | — | — | 39.4% | -1.09 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.8 | +0.16 | 1990 | 1429 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1541 | 99.0 | -2.06 | +0.48 | 0.633 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1556 | 115.0 | -1.47 | +0.36 | 0.841 | 47.2% | +11 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1737 | 130.3 | -2.63 | -1.81 | 0.811 | 46.3% | +28 | -74 | +6 | 40.4% | -0.73 | 37–44 (46%) | 42–54 (44%) | 100.1 | +2.17 | — | 1500 | 93.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.1% | -2.73 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +17.40 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniel Montes De Oca
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Bates | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 23, 1990 | — |
| Chris Bailey | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 10, 1989 | — |
| Thomas Hogstedt | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 21, 1988 | — |
| Ricardo Acioly | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 28, 1988 | — |
| Paschoal Penetta | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 24, 1983 | — |