H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Thomas Hogstedt vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 1-0
Thomas Hogstedt holds a 1–0 lead over Eliot Teltscher in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1984 Brussels fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1984* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-4 6-3 | Eliot Teltscher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eliot Teltscher | #1,093 | #6 | 15 | 2,091 | 392 | 207 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | Eliot Teltscher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #106 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 71–27 | 72.4% | #10 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,909 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,928 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #24 | 1,830 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #53 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #138 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |