H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Thomas Hogstedt vs John Sadri H2H: 2-0
Thomas Hogstedt holds a 2–0 lead over John Sadri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1986 Stockholm second round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | John Sadri | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1983* | Ferrara | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-4 6-3 | John Sadri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Sadri | #997 | #14 | 0 | 1,976 | 214 | 189 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Hogstedt | John Sadri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #45 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #38 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #130 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |