H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Hogstedt vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-0

Thomas Hogstedt holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1988 Schenectady round of 16 0-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Hogstedt #344 0-6 6-2 7-5 Paul Annacone #48 Match data Jul 22, 1988* R16 Schenectady ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Paul Annacone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0
21 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2
23 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2
24 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2
25 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2
26 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3
27 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
28 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Paul Annacone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1%
23 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4% — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 45/54 of Thomas Hogstedt's and 9/11 of Paul Annacone's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Paul Annacone
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 28/34 4.1 3.5 51.7% 67.9% 46.3% 50.1% 44.9% 57.3% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 10/13 4.8 4.6 51.4% 65.6% 47.6% 52.6% 56.3% 56.8% 35.3% 1991 3/5 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.0% 48.4% 58.9% 37.5% 58.0% 28.9%
29 1993 2/2 6.5 6.0 44.7% 63.3% 30.7% 35.6% 53.6% 45.4% 34.6% 1992 5/5 12.8 9.4 52.7% 72.1% 45.4% 59.5% 48.1% 59.4% 35.5%
30 1994 5/5 3.8 2.2 53.9% 66.9% 53.5% 34.1% 45.5% 60.5% 33.3% 1993 1/1 4.0 3.0 61.7% 75.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 61.7% 25.5%
Career — 45/243 4.3 3.7 51.6% 67.1% 46.7% 48.3% 47.9% 57.0% 34.9% — 9/291 8.4 7.0 55.6% 70.1% 45.7% 52.7% 39.2% 59.2% 32.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Paul Annacone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.67 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01
20 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.47 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07
21 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.64 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74
22 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51
23 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82
24 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01
25 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.52 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06
26 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.36 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38
27 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79
28 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.16 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29
29 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
30 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17 — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.