H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Hogstedt vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-1

Thomas Hogstedt holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1987 Brussels round of 32 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Hogstedt #134 7-6 6-4 Tomas Smid #59 Match data Mar 26, 1987* R32 Brussels ATP 250 Carpet
Thomas Hogstedt #137 3-6 6-4 6-4 Tomas Smid #49 Match data Feb 11, 1987* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #14 6-3 6-3 Thomas Hogstedt #61 Match data Apr 13, 1984* R16 Luxembourg ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Hogstedt Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.47 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.64 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.52 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.36 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.16 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.