H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-1
Thomas Johansson and Albert Portas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2000 Moscow third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2000* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1998* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Albert Portas | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |