H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Igor Kunitsyn H2H: 2-0
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Igor Kunitsyn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2008 Miami Masters first round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 6-3 7-6(3) | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Igor Kunitsyn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |