H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1998 Cincinnati Masters third round 5-7 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1998* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1998* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-7(1) 7-5 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |