H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-0
Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1997 Hong Kong fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1997* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-2 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |